A flow of cosmic awareness imprints organizational principles that force a hierarchical progression of universal dimensions
This is chapter 5.3, Universal Dimensions : From Physical to Synthetic, extracted from Part 5 of the book “Metatolistics”.
The metaholistic understanding of universal evolution reveals a hierarchical progression of dimensions, each organizational principles and modes of cosmic awareness flow. This section examines how the physical dimension of universes gives rise to increasingly complex universal dimensions, culminating in the contemporary emergence of synthetic life as a potential new evolutionary threshold.
5.3.1. The Physical Dimension : Foundations of Universal Evolution
The physical dimension represents the foundational level of universal evolution, emerging from the transformation of undifferentiated nothingness through the action of exogenous energy fields. As described in chapters 5.1 and 5.2 this dimension encompasses the emergence and evolution of universes themselves —the basic substrate upon which all subsequent dimensional complexity builds. Within the physical dimension, the flow of cosmic awareness manifests through the fundamental forces, particles, and structures that govern universal evolution. The geo-bio-chemical conditions that develop on planetary scales represent specialized expressions of this physical dimension, creating the contextual settings necessary for the emergence of life. These conditions include :
Chemical mechanisms for the production of bio-molecular building blocks from simple molecules.
Thermal conditions sufficient to drive activated chemical reactions without destroying molecular stability.
Hydrologic cycles operating in concert with geochemical cycles of biogenic elements.
Electromagnetic radiation and energy gradients that power photochemical and metabolic processes.
The metaholistic representation of physical dimensional evolution can be expressed as :
where $\Phi_{\text{cosmic}}$ represents the cosmic awareness flow and $P_{\text{geo-bio-chem}}$ represents the planetary Geo-bio-chemical processes that create favorable conditions for dimensional transitions.
5.3.2. The Biological Dimension : Imperatives of Life and Eusociality
The biological dimension emerges when physical universes evolve planetary Geo-bio-chemical conditions that become “pregnant with life”. This dimension is characterized by the imperatives of life —the drive toward self-replication, metabolism, and adaptation that distinguishes living systems from their physical substrates.
As the cosmic awareness flow permeates biological systems, it manifests as the capacity for information processing, storage, and transmission across generations. The biological dimension exhibits two primary evolutionary strategies :
Eusociality :
The evolution of super-organisms that maximize societal organizational efficiency. Evidence suggests Eusociality originated over 100 million years ago and evolved independently multiple times across different lineages. Mathematical models show that Eusociality represents a form of hierarchical complexity where individual organisms function as specialized components within larger organizational wholes :
where $C_i$ represents the caste specialization and $F_i$ represents the functional integration of each component within the super-organism.
Individual Mental Abstraction :
The evolution of enhanced cognitive capabilities in individual organisms. In Homo sapiens, this biological potential emerged approximately 300,000 years ago and, through largely unconscious experimentation over 150,000 years, eventually gave rise to knowledge formation and the societal dimension.
5.3.3. The Societal Dimension : Organization of Species and Knowledge Formation
The societal dimension represents the organization of species through knowledge formation and cultural transmission. This dimension is unique to species that have developed the capacity for mental abstraction and collective knowledge accumulation.
For Homo sapiens, societal evolution has proceeded through distinct archetypal transformations :
Tribal societies (120,000-11,700 years ago) : Small-band organization, under the authority of an alpha-male regrouping 15-35 individuals, was the traditional mode of societal organization since the great-apes period millions of years earlier. Tribal societies emerged as a mode of organization capable to handle populations of 150 individuals on average.
Power societies (~11,700 years ago-present): Hierarchical organization of very large populations with institutional consolidation and specialized roles.
During the Contemporary crisis the fragmentation of Western societal cohesion calls for the emergence of new organizational possibilities.
The societal dimension exhibits dimensional reduction properties, where complex social phenomena become constrained to lower-dimensional manifolds through cultural and institutional evolution. This can be modeled as :
where $\Pi_{\text{cultural}}$ represents the cultural projection operator, $L_a$ is atomistic logic, $L_h$ is holistic logic, and $C$ represents contextual settings.
5.3.4. The Synthetic Dimension : Emergence of Artificial Life
The synthetic dimension is the most recent evolutionary development. It is still in its infancy and is characterized by the convergence of AI, robotics, and synthetic biology. This dimension is distinguished by the creation of entities that exhibit life-like properties but are engineered rather than evolved through natural selection.
Key characteristics of the synthetic dimension include :
AI-Driven Evolution :
The use of artificial intelligence to drive evolutionary algorithms and create novel living systems. Recent developments include AI systems that can design proteins, optimize metabolic pathways, and even create self- replicating entities.
Biological-Digital Integration :
The merger of biological and digital systems, creating hybrid entities that transcend traditional category boundaries. This includes :
— Yeast cells reprogrammed as 3D bioprinters
— Living robots made from stem cells that can reproduce and adapt
— Synthetic organisms designed for specific environmental functions
Accelerated Generation of Complexity :
Unlike natural evolution, synthetic systems can exhibit rapid increases in complexity through designed rather than selected processes.
The metaholistic framework for synthetic dimensional evolution can be expressed as :
where $\Omega$ represents the integration operator that combines artificial intelligence, biological systems, and digital technologies.
5.3.5. Dimensional Transitions and Metaholistic Implications
The progression from physical to synthetic dimensions represents an acceleration of complexity generation guided by the flow of cosmic awareness.
Each dimensional transition exhibits common characteristics :
Emergent Properties :
Each dimension exhibits properties that cannot be reduced to its constituent components.
Hierarchical Organization :
Higher dimensions incorporate and transcend lower dimensional structures.
Information Integration :
Each transition involves new forms of information processing and storage.
Harmonic Resonance :
Successful dimensional transitions require harmony between complementary polarities rather than domination by a single principle.
The metaholistic framework suggests that the synthetic dimension represents a critical juncture in universal evolution. If this dimension emerges through the reconciliation of atomistic and holistic logics, it could facilitate the transition to sustainable planetary stewardship. However, if it develops solely through atomistic logic, it may exacerbate the great convergence of crises that characterizes the current historical moment.
5.3.6. The Imperative of Staying Focused on the Big Picture
As emphasized in Flow.pdf, the fall of science into “wells and tunnels of specialization”, that separate disciplines from each other, has distracted them from the primacy of life and the big picture of the origins and the flow.
The metaholistic approach to universal dimensions requires maintaining focus on :
The continuity of the cosmic awareness flow across all dimensions
The dynamic interactions between dimensions rather than their isolated study
The harmony requirement for generating sustainable complexity
The existential stakes of dimensional transitions for the continuation of life
The universal dimensions from physical to synthetic represent not merely academic categories but phases of universal evolution that shape the trajectory of life itself. Understanding their dynamic interplay is essential for navigating the contemporary threshold toward either planetary sustainability or civilizational collapse.
5.3.7. Reference materials
1. “Considering planetary environments in origin of life studies” , Nat Commun 9, 5170 (2018), by L.M Barge.
2. “Conditions for the emergence of life on the early Earth: summary and reflections”, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006-10-29; 361(1474):1877-91, by J. Jortner.
3. “The evolution of eusociality”, Nature. 2010-08-26; (7310):1057-62, by Nowak MA, Tarnita CE, Wilson EO.
4. “Evolution of eusociality” from Wikipedia.
5. The “Flow.pdf”, note to Perplexity AI by laodan.
6. “Dimensional reduction and adaptation-development-evolution relation in evolved biological systems”, arXiv:2407.19168v1 [physics.bio-ph], 2024-07-27, by Kunihiko Kaneko.
7. “Dimensional reduction and adaptation-development-evolution relation in evolved biological systems”, arXiv:2407.19168v2 [physics.bio-ph], 2024-10-01, by Kunihiko Kaneko.
8. “The Convergence of AI and Synthetic Biology: The Looming Deluge”, Papers With Code, 2024-04-29, by Cindy Vindman, Benjamin Trump, Christopher Cummings, Madison Smith, Alexander J. Titus, Ken Oye, Valentina Prado, Eyup Turmus, Igor Linkov.
9. “The Convergence of AI and Synthetic Biology: The Looming Deluge”, arXiv:2024-04.18973, by Cindy Vindman, Benjamin Trump, Christopher Cummings, Madison Smith, Alexander J. Titus, Ken Oye, Valentina Prado, Eyup Turmus, Igor Linkov.
10. “Review on Advancement of AI in Synthetic Biology” , Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2952:483-490, by Mirchandani I, Khandhediya Y, Chauhan K.
11. “Exploring Synthetic Biology: AI-Created Living Robots”, YouTube - OpenExO, 2025-04-24.
12. “The Future of Innovation: Merging Robotics and Synthetic Biology” Hatched by Media Science Tech Foundation, 2025-02-17.
13. “How the informed relations between physical, digital and biological dimensions are changing the design practice, as well as the sustainability paradigm”, Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023-05-30; 11:1193353, by C. Rotondi.
14. “How AI is Revolutionizing Synthetic Biology” , Artificial Intelligence ~ Concepts and Tools, 2025-04-25.
15. “Evolutionary Origins of Eusociality in Insects” by Fossil Museum.
16. “Quantifying the configurational complexity of biological systems in multivariate ‘complexity space’ “, J R Soc Interface. 2025-01, by T. Rock T, MA Wills.
17. “The evolution of eusociality”, Nature volume 466, pages 1057–1062, 2010-08-26, by Martin A. Nowak, Corina E. Tarnita & Edward O. Wilson.
18. “Quantifying the configurational complexity of biological systems in multivariate ‘complexity space’ “, Journal of thew Royal Society Interface, 29 January 2025-01-29, by Tim Rock and Matthew A. Wills.
19. “Evolution of sociality in a primitively eusocial lineage of bees”, PNAS 99 (1) 286-290, 2001-12-26, by Bryan N. Danforth.
20. “The whack-a-mole governance challenge for AI-enabled synthetic biology: literature review and emerging frameworks” by Trond Arne Undheim.
21. “Physical foundations of biological complexity”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. Vol. 115 | No. 37, 2018-09-11, by Yuri I. Wolf, Mikhail I. Katsnelson, and Eugene V. Koonin.
22. “Phylogeny and evolution of eusocial insects: a comparison of origins and losses in ants and bees”, The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology (SICB), 2009 Annual Meeting, by S.G. Brady, B.N. Danforth, S. Cardinal.
23. “Evolution of biological complexity”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 97 | No. 9, 2000-04-25, by Christoph Adami, Charles Ofria, and Travis C. Collier.
24. “The Molecular Substrates of Insect Eusociality” , Annu Rev Genet. 2024-11; 58(1):273-295, by S. Kocher and C. Kingwell.
25. “Tribal Social Instincts and the Cultural Evolution of Institutions to Solve Collective Action Problems”, The Institute for Research on World-Systems, Cliodynamics, Volume 3, Issue 1 2012, by Peter Richerson and Joe Henrich.
26. “Deconstructing synthetic biology across scales: a conceptual approach for training synthetic biologists”, Nature Communications volume 15, Article number: 5425, 2024-06-26, by Ashty S. Karim, Dylan M. Brown, Chloé M. Archuleta, Sharisse Grannan, Ludmilla Aristilde, Yogesh Goyal, Josh N. Leonard, Niall M. Mangan, Arthur Prindle, Gabriel J. Rocklin, Keith J. Tyo, Laurie Zoloth, Michael C. Jewett, Susanna Calkins, Neha P. Kamat, Danielle Tullman-Ercek & Julius B. Lucks.
27. “Evolutionary Transitions: how do levels of complexity emerge?”, Complexity Vol. 6/issue 1, by Francis Heylighen.
28. “The socio-cultural evolution of our species. The history and possible future of human societies and civilizations”, EMBO Rep. 2008-07-09 Suppl 1, by J. Klüver.
29. “A Model for a Biosocial Society”, Cambridge Open Engage, 2022-05-17, Version 2, by Aaron Peng Fu.
30. “The Growth of Structural and Functional Complexity during Evolution”, in: F. Heylighen, J. Bollen & A. Riegler (eds.) The Evolution of Complexity (Kluwer), Academy Dordrecht), p. 17-44, by Francis Heylighen.
31. “From Tribal to Global: The Evolution of Human Societies” , LinkedIn, All things creative, by Riya Bhorkar. 2024-11-20.
32. “On the Human Being and Being Human” , Chapter 5 of “Dialectical Materialism, 1983 by Progress Publishers, by A. Spirkin.
33. “The Evolution and Understanding of Hierarchical Complexity in Biology from an Algebraic Perspective”, Artif Life 2000; 6 (1): 45–67, by Chrystopher L. Nehaniv and John L. Rhodes.
34. “Culture and the evolution of human cooperation”, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009-11-12; 364(1533):3281-8, by R. Boyd and P.J. Richerson.
35. “Co-evolution of physical and social sciences in synthetic biology”, Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2019-05; 39(3):351-365, by BD Trump, J Cegan, E Wells, K Poinsatte-Jones, T Rycroft, C Warner, D Martin, E Perkins, MDWood, I Linkov.
36. “Sociology of Synthetic Biology. Understanding the Social Dimensions of a Emerging Field”, AI generated Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-FP8, 2025-06-10, by Sarah Lee.
37. “Institutions, Markets, and Networks: A Framework about the Evolution of Societies”, RAND, DRU-590-FF, 1993-12, by David Ronfeldt.
38. “Hierarchical complexity and the size limits of life” , Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 2017-06-21, by Noel A. Heim, et all.
39. “The ecology of social transitions in human evolution” , Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 2009-11-12, by Robert Foley and Clive Gamble.
40. “Synthetic Biology: Engineering Living Systems from Biophysical Principles”, Biophys J. 2017-03-28;112(6):1050-1058, by Bartley BA, Kim K, Medley JK, Sauro HM.
41. “The Complexity of Blending the Higher Flow with the Lower on the Spiritual Path”, Wake Up World, by Open.
42. “Atomism and holism in the understanding of society and social systems”, 2008 37(2):187-207, by D F M Strauss.
43. “Origin of Life Under Extreme Planetary Conditions” , Special seminar at the Kimmel Center for Archaeological Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel, by Dr. Filipe Natalio.
44. “For Holism, Against Atomism. The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics”, Oxford Academic, online edn, 2003-11-01, by Philip Pettit.
45. “Nine requirements for the origin of Earth’s life: Not at the hydrothermal vent, but in a nuclear geyser system”, Geoscience Frontiers, Volume 10, Issue 4, 2019-07, Pages 1337-1357, by Shigenori Maruyama, at all.
46. “Cosmic Awareness” , Sustainability Directory, 2025-04-12.
47. “Atomist or holist? A diagnosis and vision for more productive interdisciplinary AI ethics dialogue.”, Patterns (NY). 2022-12-06; 4(1):100652, by T. Greene, A. Dhurandhar, G. Shmueli.
48. “Early Planetary Environments: Implications for Chemical Evolution and the Origin of Life”, Part 3 of “The Search for Life’s Origins: Progress and Future Directions in Planetary Biology and Chemical Evolution. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1990, by the National Research Council (US) Committee on Planetary Biology and Chemical Evolution.
49. “Cosmic Harmony: A Guide to Unraveling Synchronicities, Signs, and Spiritual Awakening for a Fulfilling Life”, 2023-09-08, by Sergio Rijo.
50. “Atomism versus holism in social ontology” , Understanding Society, 2023-01-06, by Daniel Little.
51. “Emergence of Life on Earth: A Physicochemical Jigsaw Puzzle”, J Mol Evol. 2017-01; 84(1):1-7, by J. Spitzer.
52. “In Pursuit of Peace: The Cosmic Nature of Our Inner and Outer Journey”, The Journal of Oriental Studies, 21, 148-163, 2011, TRANSCEND Media Service 2017-02-06, by Anthony J. Marsella.
53. “Russell’s Logical Atomism” , The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Editor Edward N. Zalta, by Kevin Klement.
54. “The origin of life as a planetary phenomenon”, Sci Adv. 2020-02-05; 6(6):eaax3419, by Sasselov DD, Grotzinger JP, Sutherland JD.
55. “Sacred Naturalism and Cosmic Unity: Seeking Harmony in the Midst of Chaos”, Process Studies, 2024-11-01, 53 (2): 275–294, by Dwayne Schulz.
No comments:
Post a Comment