Summary of “Metaholistics”

An Axiomatic Framework for a Coherent Abstract System of Holistic Logic

 

 

The book “Metaholistics” provides an extensive and detailed formalization of a novel abstract system of holistic logic developed to complement and integrate with the dominant Western atomistic logic. It elaborates complex modal-temporal logics and their semantics, axioms, operators, canonical models, and dynamic polarity and harmony processes.

Below is a comprehensive summary and explanation addressing the key insights and core components of this abstract system of holistic logic as presented in the document

 

 

1. Overview of Metaholistics

Metaholistics formalizes a complementary holistic logic to Western atomistic logic, aiming to reconcile persistent crises arising from Western Modernity’s fragmented, reductionist epistemic framework. It is built on an abstract axiomatic system that integrates the dual polarities of persistence (continuity, stability) and novelty (change, innovation), embedding these within a modal-temporal semantic framework which accounts for both cosmic directionality and local conditionality.

 

2. Fundamental Concepts

1. Nothingness as Ontological Ground: All differentiated states emerge from an undifferentiated horizon of “nothingness,” conceived as a generative plenum of potentiality.

2. Polarity Fields: The dynamic interplay of persistence vs. novelty fields animates emergence and transformation.

3. Assemblies & Arbitrage: Local assemblies filter and arbitrate possible transitions between states, enforcing harmony and governing local evolution and stability.

4. Harmony as Modal Constraint: Only transitions preserving or restoring systemic harmony are possible; disharmony leads to collapse or regression.

5. Hierarchy of Emergence: Layers of reality emerge in strict partial order: nothingness → physical → biological → societal → synthetic.

6. Eternal Cosmic Directionality with Local Reversibility: The overall cosmic evolution is unidirectional and irreversible, but local systems may revert or collapse conditionally.

    

3. Formal Axioms and Logical Structure

The system is axiomatically formalized with explicit modal-temporal logic using Kripke semantics and strong mathematical rigor:

 

4. Modal-Temporal Logic and Semantics

1. States and Worlds (W): Represent configurations embedding layered poles of persistence and novelty, context, and assemblies.

2. Accessibility Relations (R): Govern possible transitions filtered for harmony, context, and assemblies, encoding emergence, collapse, or local reversibility.

3. Temporal Operators such as Next (X), Always (G), Eventually (F) model time evolution of states.

4. Polarity Modalities (□p, ◇v): Express necessary persistence and possible novelty, with their cyclic oscillation fundamental to systemic evolution and stability.

5. Multi-Modal Extension: Distinguish cosmic (universal) and local (contingent) modalities to reflect layered realities.

6. Canonical Kripke Models: Built from maximally consistent sets of formulas, serving as semantic universes validating the logical system and providing completeness.

    

5. Dynamic Modeling of Polarity and Harmony

1. Polarity oscillations cycle between persistence and novelty, driving the evolutionary dynamics in physical, biological, societal, and synthetic domains.

2. Assemblies serve as complex adaptive systems arbitraging transformations which propagate or collapse by respecting harmony and contextual filters.

3. Modal-temporal operators describe polarity transition operators (PTN, NTP) capturing essential polarity shifts.

4. Harmonic balance is mandatory for transformative transitions, with formal rules encoding harmony maintenance and transformation necessity.

5. The logic includes rules and axioms ensuring polarity exclusivity, oscillation, and transformation governed by harmony and context.

6. Local reversibility zones and directionality gradients describe areas of reversible dynamics and preferred emergent flows, contributing to resilience and meta-stability.

7. Metrics for harmony propagation, disruption spread, connectivity, and propagation speed formalize the systemic health and responsiveness.

    

6. Applications to Societal Knowledge and Evolution

1. The framework models societal knowledge formation as a process balancing holistic and atomistic logics.

2. It accounts for historical societal archetypes, bifurcations, and transitions between paradigms.

3. Assemblies correspond to social institutions, decision-making bodies, and cultural clusters whose arbitration governs societal evolution.

4. The holistic logic aims to guide after-modernity paradigms, integrating diverse worldviews with formal rigor.

5. It offers a mathematical base for simulating societal collapse and transformation, capturing multidimensional crises and their convergence.

6. Modal-temporal polarity logic grounds the operationalization of societal transitions and governance in formal interaction models and assembly dynamics.

    

7. Summary

The book “Metaholistics” is a profound, mathematically rigorous development of an abstract system of holistic logic that complements atomistic logic by formalizing polarity dynamics, hierarchical emergence, harmony, assemblies, and contextual filtering within a modal-temporal logical framework. It provides a foundational epistemic and ontological system aimed at addressing the limitations of Western logic in societal knowledge formation and evolution, offering a path towards a more integrated, resilient, and holistic understanding of complex universal and societal processes.

Click on the image of the cover page to download the book

 

Conversations with AI’s about an “Abstract System of Holistic Logic”

While writing “The societal cultural field shapes the contemporary” my mind got captured by the thought that something is definitely missing in the debate about the consequences of the convergence of the multiple crises of Late Western Modernity. The hegemonic triumph of the West has indeed imposed its “abstract system of atomistic logic” as a one way street that has debased the process of societal knowledge formation. But this fact remains unacknowledged !

Atomism has been the exclusive system of logic, of the governing establishment of Western societies, for the last 2000 plus years while it violently repressed all manifestations of holism. This literally shaped a totalitarian atmosphere as the history of so many Southern nations is attesting. The present redistribution of the geopolitical cards is realized in the atmosphere of this totalitarianism. It should thus not come as a surprise that the shift —from a Western centric world order into a new world order driven by societies whose knowledge abides by a holistic vision— causes such widespread Western resentment.

The future world order, if by chance there is ever one, will inevitably come to blame the old Western centric world order for having caused the present predicament of humanity. And China’s holistic logic will inevitably be seen as humanity’s most important asset in trying to manage the world out of its predicament. But we should always remain grounded in the reality that the degradation of the habitat of life is already very advanced which implies that there is no guarantee any longer that managing the world out of its predicament will be successful. But this should not limit the urgency, for an “abstract system of holistic logic”, to counter the hegemony of mathematics and science !

The book 4, of the metaholistic series, is an essay at formalizing the archetypal “system of abstract holistic logic” in the present context of Western atomistic hegemony. Metaholistics is the outcome of this formalization. It is intended as an open source contribution to humanity’s urgent need to counter-balance the “abstract system of atomistic logic” that is so widely known under the appellation of mathematics.

Book 1“The Interactive Continuum of the Cultural Field of Societies” and book 2 “The societal cultural field shapes the contemporary“, provide the metaphysical background, from which were derived the axioms and the concepts upon which rests the formalization of the metaholistic framework that is described in books 3 and 4. These axioms and concepts were induced by an intuitive holistic approach of societal evolution which originated in a lifelong independent research rooted in a strict application of logic. But this implies that some of these concepts are still not recognized by an academy that has no tolerance for any research dabbling outside of atomistic logic.

After terminating the first draft, of book 2, I started an in-depth conversation with 4 AI platforms about Ontology, Epistemology, metaphysics and “abstract systems of societal logic”. These platforms are Perplexity AI, Chat mistral AI, Deepseek AI and Qwen AI. These conversations are transcribed in the first part of the book 3 of the metaholistic series.

My 6th question to these AI platforms was “What is the path from a holistic axiomatic foundation to an abstract system of holistic logic”. In its response Perplexity AI proposed me to formalize my axioms into an abstract system of holistic logic. I decided to give it a try and got hooked in a full-time intellectual adventure. The 2^nd part of book 03 recounts our conversations about writing this formalization while book 04 is the mature version of the process described in Book 3.

I personally wrote book 1 and 2 while the abstract formalization, of the metaholistic framework in book 4, was rewritten 4 times by Perplexity AI following my clarifications in successive corrective notes about its foundational axioms and concepts.

Book 3 is free. Click on its cover-page to download it.

The urgent need, of an abstract system of holistic logic, for Homo-Sapiens' further reproduction

Our contemporary world does no longer disposes of a rigorous “abstract system of holistic logic”, that could stand its ground alongside mathematics, which has developed as the hegemonic “abstract system of atomistic logic” of Western-Modernity. The process of contemporary knowledge formation, that is at the core of Western modernity, is therefore biased. It is indeed aligning with a dualist materialist technical rationality that disregards the necessity of the cosmic constraint of persistence in the universal dimensions of physics, biology, and human societies which form the bedrock of the reality of our universe's continuity.

In holistic logic both the “abstract system of atomistic logic” and the “abstract system of holistic logic” are viewed as the complementary polarities of the process of societal knowledge formation.

By aligning exclusively with dualism, materialism, and technical rationality, Western Modernity irrevocably separated from the cosmic constraint of continuity, which distorts its approach to knowledge formation, thus engaging societies on paths that are incompatible with the cosmic order.

This explains why the younger generations are now inheriting a predicament that will force them to address the societal contradictions with the cosmic order : abject record historical levels of social inequality, Western societal atomization, and the incapacitation of the world order to address the degradation of the habitat of life by the numerous side-effects of Western-Modernity.

Today’s abrupt acceleration, of the habitat’s degradation by the great convergence of these multiple crises, was caused by our species’ reliance, on the sole “abstract system of atomistic logic”.

The culprit of our present predicament is thus the materialist technical rationality of the atomistic logic of Western Modernity, and science, which acts as its instrument of preference. But we should remain clear-headed, for it was the rationality of Western-Modernity, that forced this path onto science.

A brief detour through history shows us that the emergence of the archetypal model of power societies in the Tri-Continental-Area initiated a separation between the men of force and the men of knowledge, who were in charge of governance, and the rest of their societies. The cultural evolution of Western societies, during the centuries following the fall of the Roman Empire, exacerbated this separation, while the Enlightenment completed it.

Rupture and separation with the cosmic order fertilized the ground in which the knowledge paradigm of Modernity emerged. And it rapidly imposed its dualist materialist technical rationality to the whole world.

The centuries long hegemony of this technical rationality concludes today with a predicament for humanity that takes the form of an abrupt degradation of the habitat of life on earth !

To preserve the future, for the younger generations, we most urgently need an “abstract system of holistic logic” to act as the complementary polarity of mathematics and science. Their confrontation is bound to force a reconciliation of human thought and actions with the constraints imposed by the cosmic order. This incontrovertible observation originated the imperative of writing “Metaholistics”.

Metaholistics is an “abstract system of holistic logic” that confronts the atomistic logic embodied in mathematical and scientific rationality. This confrontation is bound to lead to their reconciliation into a form of knowledge that is compatible with the cosmic order.

Here are the key points and summaries of its content that are relevant to understanding its framework and its rigorous formalization.

1. Overview and Philosophical Foundations

Western modernity is dominated by an atomistic logic that focuses on the microcosm (fundamental particles, reductionism, dualism) and generates multiple crises like social atomization, societal atomization, the degradation of the habitat, and epistemic fragmentation.

In contrast East Asian civilizations embody a holistic logic that focuses on the macrocosm —emphasis on complementary polarities, continuity, harmony, and context— and provides a model of societal cohesion and adaptive governance.

Metaholistics aims to reconcile and synthesize their “complementary abstract systems of logic” — atomistic and holistic— into a new epistemic framework for societal knowledge formation that is both rigorous and practically oriented toward complexity, context, and planetary sustainability.

2. Core Axiomatic foundation

Metaholistics is rooted in explicit foundational axioms that are formalized within a custom modal-temporal logic with Kripke semantics. Its key axioms include :

• Emergence from Nothingness : All differentiated states emerge from an underlying undifferentiated potentiality ("nothingness").

• Local Reversibility and Cosmic Irreversibility : Local systems may revert or collapse, but cosmic evolution is unidirectional and irreversible.

• Harmony as Modal Constraint : Only transitions preserving or restoring harmony (balanced polarity) are sustainable.

• Layered Hierarchical Emergence : Reality unfolds in layers (nothingness, physical, biological, societal, synthetic) with strict adjacency.

• Assembly Arbitrage : Assemblies (complex adaptive collectives) arbitrate which transitions persist, filtering permissible transformations in context.

• Polarity Duality : The tension and cyclic interplay between persistence and novelty drive evolution.

• Contextual workability or permission : Transformations only occur in favorable local and cosmic contexts.

• Interconnectedness : System states are richly connected; local changes propagate through assemblies and networks.

3. Formal Logical and Semantic Framework

Metaholistics adopts a richly structured modal-temporal logic with predicates for polarity, harmony, context, assemblies, and temporal operators (next, eventually, always).

Canonical Kripke models are constructed with maximally consistent sets of formulas as worlds, providing soundness and completeness via a Truth Lemma linking syntax and semantics.

The framework extends to multi-modal logics distinguishing cosmic and local modalities, hybrid logics with nominals for explicit state referencing, and dynamic filtering mechanisms.

The semantic architecture models states as structured polarity fields in space/time, with accessibility relations encoding permitted transitions respecting harmony and polarity constraints.

4. Dynamics of Polarity and Harmony

Polarity dynamics formalize the oscillatory interplay between persistence (stability) and novelty (change), modeled mathematically by coupled nonlinear differential equations or modal operators.

Assemblies act as local arbitrage agents filtering system transformations to maintain systemic harmony and guide evolution.

The framework characterizes emergence, collapse, stability, resilience, and meta-stability in adaptive systems through formal axioms and dynamic models.

Hierarchical clustering of assembly networks and adaptive filtering explain how local and global systemic coherence emerge and persist.

5. Applications and Future Directions

The metaholistic framework offers tools for modeling complex adaptive systems across physical, biological, societal, and synthetic dimensions.

It provides a foundational logic for automated proof systems, model checking, formal verification, knowledge representation, and dynamic system modeling.

The framework encourages open collaboration for further formal development, computational tool support, and application to emerging scientific and societal challenges.

This summary highlights the major components and the rigor of the metaholistic framework as presented in the book. This book offers a rich, rigorous formal logic system designed to bridge foundational worldviews, integrate complementary logics, and provide practical instruments for understanding and guiding complex evolution in knowledge and society.

The book is free. Click on its cover-page to download it.

The path forward to an abstract system of holistic logic

From a purely logical perspective holism/atomism are the complementary polarities, that animate the spectrum of humanity’s epistemology, about the evolution of the cosmic order. Holism is a “local knowledge perspective” gained from a focus on the whole while atomism is a “local knowledge perspective” gained from a focus on the fundamental particles.

Atomism vs holism. Question 4

Would a coherent logical abstraction, of traditional holism, contain the potential to stand its ground against the mathematics of atomism ?

 I’m presently writing a 3rd book for the Volume 1 of the collection titled “The Transition from Western-Modernity to After-Modernity”. It is a conversation with 4 AI’s about the two approaches of metaphysics that have formed human historical worldviews. Holism is a “local knowledge perspective” gained from a focus on the whole while atomism is a “local knowledge perspective” gained from a focus on the fundamental particles.

Here follows question 4, of the 6 questions, I asked Perplexity, Le Chat Mistral, Deepseek and Qwen.

First Edition of "The Societal Cultural Field Shapes the Contemporary"

I just uploaded the First Edition of Book 02 "The Societal Cultural Field Shapes the Contemporary", of the Volume 01 of my series about "The transition from Western-Modernity to After-Modernity".

 

-------------- 

It is now available on my website for download.

-------------- 

Revision 01 of "Concepts and Synthesis".

I just uploaded the revision 01 of the Volume 00 "Concepts and synthesis", of my series about "The transition from Western-Modernity to After-Modernity".

 

-------------- 

It is now available on my website for download.

-------------- 

 

 

Laodan on Substack

 I added a substack account. 

Please subscribe (free).

laodan

Revision 01 of "The Interactive Continuum of the Societal Cultural Field"

I just uploaded the revision 01 of "The Interactive Continuum of the Societal Cultural Field", the book 01 of the Volume 1 of my series about "The transition from Western-Modernity to After-Modernity".

--------------

It is now available on my website for download.

--------------

This Book 01 is about the theory of "societal evolution":

-- Societal knowledge formation

-- Knowledge paradigms and foundational societal worldviews

-- Societal systems of logic

-- The archetypal model of power societies and its spread in the realm of civilizations

-- The knowledge paradigm of Modernity

-- The dualist, and materialist technical rationality, of Western-Modernity

-- The shift of the "economy-world of Western-Modernity" outside the realm of the Western civilization

-- The great Convergence of the side effects of Western-Modernity

-- The predicament of Late-Western-Modernity  

Laodan